Redrum

Thank god!

filesys

Advertisements

Constructivism

Constructivism is a psychological theory of knowledge (epistemology) [1] which argues that humans construct knowledge and meaning from their experiences. Constructivism is not a specific pedagogy, although it is often confused with Constructionism, an educational theory developed by Seymour Papert.

constructive

Traumatic brain injury

I think 66.222.155.81 may have suffered a [[Traumatic brain injury]]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Traumatic_brain_injury&curid=1057414&diff=256460425&oldid=256342233

The Dark Country

I didn’t know muskrats could do that…

darkc

Photosynthesis

Lots of  Science topics have had interesting vandalism, ad Photosynthesis to the mixphotosynth

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Photosynthesis&diff=prev&oldid=256456103

The Darwin effect.

You would think these people would have become extinct by now…

…But they are correct in where reproductive cells containing genetic material are stored

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genetics&curid=12266&diff=256446455&oldid=256079521

Things we can all agree upon.

Some Wikipedia vandals like to make sure their approval on a certain issue or argument is well known. Here’s an example of someone who just loves to agree.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Midnight_Club:_Los_Angeles&diff=prev&oldid=256376042

A more diverging oppinion..

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sulphur_High_School_(Louisiana)&diff=prev&oldid=256380863

Gem of a User, #2

This sums up the demise of someone who decides they don’t want to be a contributor after all..

User talk:67.53.37.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

So this is the thanks I get for contributing to your stupid wiki? Fine fuck you all, I won’t waste any more of my free time posting verifiable facts here. Ungrateful little pricks. This “community” sucks cock!

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joke, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joke was changed by 67.53.37.222 (u) (t) deleting 29266 characters on 2008-10-06T20:32:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. dvdrw 20:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC) fuck you i dont give a shit about this site anymore i was trying to fucking help you guys and you threaten to ban me WELL YOU CAN GO SHOVE IT PRICKS

Well that’s no reason to vandalise. Stop or you are going to be blocked. dvdrw 20:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Well I don’t fucking care! I don’t want the “privilege” of helping you faggots any longer when you threaten to ban me for no fucking reason! JERKS!

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. dvdrw 20:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

lol you dumb narcissists just have to have the last word even though you started this huh? Figures.

88.106.169.24

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vandals, you will be blocked from editing. srushe (talk) 13:28, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn’t make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Vandalism (band). If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Wrong srushe (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn’t make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. srushe (talk) 13:33, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn’t make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

1 week block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia’s blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 13:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Never thought of it that way…

By this logic, they would not have any parents to talk to, nor would they exist!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sex_education&diff=prev&oldid=256364366

A Gem of a User

User talk:24.231.69.38 – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Lets see what this fellow has contributed…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Gaming?diff=202390219

maybe trying to prove himself?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_League_Gaming?diff=202390815

Waggers, steps in to the rescue only to be greeted with this nice post on his talk page

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AWaggers&diff=202391498&oldid=200539432

But things really get interesting when:

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: “I bet your an idiot who never had a girlfriend and masterbates intensely to his dogs uterus whenever he can unblock me now or I will report you to microsoft”

Portland, OR

It seems this user has a negative outlook on the future tourism in their city.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Portland,_Oregon&diff=prev&oldid=250077802

Uncle?

It’s funny, but disturbing when people making idiotic edits refering to others as “retarded.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Uncle&diff=prev&oldid=211583939

iPod Touch- Hands off

I think it has to do more with being rich enough

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IPod_Touch&diff=prev&oldid=255391997

Whale song – It’s so cool!

They are so cool, the world needs to know!

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Whale_song&diff=prev&oldid=246834314

Christmas tree

While Wikipedia is a great resource for many things, it’s use as a instant messaging platform is somewhat discouraged.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Christmas_tree&diff=prev&oldid=256047664

Nevada

You have to admit, they kind of set themselves up for this one…

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nevada&diff=prev&oldid=254358422

Twilight

From Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia.

”Twilight”’ is the time before sunrise and the time after sunset. Sunlight scattering in the upper Earth’s atmosphere illuminates the lower atmosphere, and the surface of the Earth is not completely lit or completely dark.

Apparently, it’s also a popular upcoming movie series, as seen in the recent edits to this page…

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Twilight&diff=prev&oldid=256329042

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twilight_(disambiguation)

Potassium

I never knew potassium had such properties…

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Potassium&diff=252118304&oldid=251792532|

Typical…

This is the page of a user who seems to have some very strong opinions regarding well…You’ll see. I guess he didn’t learn his lesson the first 3 times.

facialact2